The Chinese Real Estate Bubble: An Economy That Could Collapse the World

Published on April 10, 2025

Imagine a country where real estate accounts for nearly 30% of its GDP, where over 65 million homes sit empty, and where the average person would need to save every penny for 50 years to afford a modest apartment. This isn't a dystopian fiction—it's the reality of modern China, and it represents perhaps the largest financial bubble in human history.

In my book The Chinese Real Estate Bubble: An Economy That Could Collapse the World, I investigate how this precarious situation developed and why its potential collapse threatens not just China but the entire global economy. The research presents a sobering reality that few Western analysts have fully grasped: when China's property market inevitably implodes, none of us will be spared the consequences.

Deng Xiaoping's Double-Edged Sword

To understand China's current predicament, we must look back to 1978, when Deng Xiaoping initiated the economic reforms that would transform China from an impoverished agricultural society into an industrial powerhouse. These reforms were remarkably successful—China's GDP grew by an average of 9.5% annually for over four decades, lifting more than 800 million people out of poverty.

However, Deng's vision for sustainable growth eventually mutated under subsequent leadership. By the early 2000s, the Chinese Communist Party had become addicted to the construction-driven growth model. With the mantra "build, build, and build again," China embarked on the most extensive construction boom in human history.

The scale is difficult to comprehend: between 2011 and 2013 alone, China used more cement than the United States did in the entire 20th century. From 2000 to 2020, real estate prices in major Chinese cities increased by over 600%, far outpacing income growth. In Beijing, the price-to-income ratio reached 50:1, meaning it would take 50 years of the average salary (with zero expenses) to purchase an apartment.

The Perfect Financial Storm

What makes China's real estate market particularly vulnerable is its unique financing model. Unlike in Western markets, Chinese developers sell properties before they're built, often when they're nothing more than architectural renderings. This "presale" system created a dangerous financial structure:

1. Developers take loans to buy land from local governments
2. They pre-sell unbuilt apartments to consumers
3. They use these funds to service existing loans and buy more land
4. Local governments depend on land sales for up to 40% of their revenue

This system functioned as long as prices kept rising and new buyers entered the market. But as legendary investor Warren Buffett wisely noted, "Only when the tide goes out do you discover who's been swimming naked." For China's property sector, the tide began receding in 2021.

Evergrande: The First Domino to Fall

The poster child for China's real estate excess is Evergrande Group. Founded by Xu Jiayin in 1996, Evergrande grew to become China's second-largest property developer, with over 1,300 projects across 280 cities. At its peak, Evergrande employed over 200,000 people directly and provided work for an estimated 3.8 million through its vast network of contractors and suppliers.

The company's debt, however, eventually reached a staggering $300 billion—comparable to the GDP of nations like Finland or Chile. When the Chinese government introduced the "three red lines" policy in 2020, restricting borrowing for over-leveraged developers, Evergrande could no longer sustain its pyramid-like financing model.

In September 2021, Evergrande defaulted on its offshore bond payments, triggering what would become a chain reaction throughout China's property sector. Since then, other major developers including Country Garden, Kaisa, and Shimao have also defaulted, sending shockwaves through the Chinese economy and beyond.

What makes Evergrande's collapse particularly significant is that it represents not an anomaly but rather the inevitable result of China's unsustainable development model. When a system requires perpetual growth to avoid collapse, any slowdown becomes existential.

Ghost Cities and the Statistics That Shock

Perhaps the most visible symbols of China's real estate excess are its infamous "ghost cities"—massive urban developments built for millions of residents that remain largely empty. These eerie, dystopian landscapes represent the physical manifestation of misallocated capital on an unprecedented scale.

Consider these startling statistics:

• China has built housing for 1.6 billion people—in a country of 1.4 billion
• Over 65 million apartments sit vacant—enough to house the combined populations of the UK, France, and Germany
• In some third and fourth-tier cities, vacancy rates exceed 30-40%
• Approximately 70% of Chinese household wealth is tied up in real estate, compared to about 35% in the United States

Cities like Ordos in Inner Mongolia, with its famous Kangbashi district, epitomize this phenomenon. Built for over a million residents, it long housed fewer than 100,000 people, its empty streets and vacant shopping malls standing as monuments to irrational exuberance.

Yet Chinese authorities continue to bulldoze forward. Even as the crisis unfolds, they've launched new megaprojects like Xiong'an—a "smart city" planned for 5 million people that has already cost $85 billion. This persistence in the face of market signals reflects a deeper truth: the Communist Party's legitimacy has become inextricably linked to economic growth, making a managed retreat politically unpalatable.

The Demographic Time Bomb

Compounding China's real estate woes is a demographic crisis of unprecedented proportions. The infamous "One Child Policy," implemented in 1979 and only officially ended in 2015, has created population dynamics that make the property bubble's deflation inevitable.

For the first time since the Great Famine of 1959-1961, China's population is shrinking. In 2022, the country recorded its first population decline in generations—a trend that demographers expect to accelerate. By 2050, China's working-age population could shrink by as much as 200 million people.

This demographic contraction creates a fundamental problem: who will buy all the apartments that have been built? As elderly Chinese pass away, they will leave behind millions of properties with no new generation large enough to absorb them. The math is simple and brutal: fewer people means less demand for housing, which means falling prices and potentially trillions in destroyed wealth.

As my research shows, China is experiencing demographic aging at a much earlier stage of economic development than did countries like Japan or South Korea. China will grow old before it grows rich, creating unique challenges for which there are no historical precedents.

Global Domino Effect

Why should Americans, Europeans, or people in other parts of the world care about China's property problems? Because in our interconnected global economy, China's crisis will quickly become everyone's crisis.

China currently consumes approximately:

• 56% of the world's cement
• 53% of global steel production
• 54% of copper demand
• 50% of zinc consumption
• 54% of global coal demand

When China's construction sector inevitably contracts, demand for these and other commodities will plummet, devastating countries that depend on resource exports. Nations like Australia, Brazil, Chile, and many African countries will see their economies severely impacted.

But the contagion doesn't stop there. China is deeply integrated into global supply chains, both as a manufacturer and a consumer. Major companies from Apple to Volkswagen depend on the Chinese market for a substantial portion of their revenues. When Chinese consumers face a wealth shock from collapsing real estate values, their purchasing power will diminish dramatically.

Financial contagion presents another risk channel. Chinese developers have issued hundreds of billions in dollar-denominated bonds, held by investors worldwide. A wave of defaults could trigger instability in global credit markets reminiscent of the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis.

Beijing's Dilemma

Chinese authorities now face an impossible trilemma: they can bail out developers and local governments, risking moral hazard and inflation; they can let market forces prevail, risking economic collapse and social unrest; or they can attempt a controlled deflation of the bubble, which history suggests is extraordinarily difficult to achieve.

So far, the government has opted for a combination of approaches—providing limited support to complete unfinished projects while allowing weaker developers to fail. This strategy aims to maintain social stability by ensuring homebuyers receive what they paid for, while still imposing market discipline on overleveraged companies.

However, the fundamental issues remain unaddressed. China must transition from an investment-driven economy to one based on consumption, a shift that requires painful structural reforms and likely entails years of significantly slower growth.

The opacity of Chinese financial data makes assessing the true magnitude of the crisis challenging. Official statistics often understate problems, and information control has intensified as the situation deteriorates. As one Chinese economist told me on condition of anonymity: "The stricter the control over information, the more worried you should be about what they're hiding."

Preparing for the Inevitable

The question is not whether China's property bubble will deflate, but when and how rapidly. The most optimistic scenario involves a gradual, managed decline over a decade or more. The most pessimistic envisions a cascading crisis that could make the 2008 global financial crisis look mild by comparison.

For investors, businesses, and policymakers worldwide, understanding this slow-motion economic catastrophe is essential. In The Chinese Real Estate Bubble, I outline potential defensive strategies and identify both the risks and opportunities that will emerge as this crisis unfolds.

As Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu wisely observed: "If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading." For China's economy—and by extension, the global financial system—that destination increasingly appears to be a painful reckoning with decades of excess.

The world has never seen a bubble of this magnitude or complexity. When it finally bursts completely, the repercussions will be felt in every corner of the globe, from Wall Street to Main Street. This is not merely a Chinese problem—it's a global challenge that will define the economic landscape for years to come.

Share This Article

Available Now